Appendix E
Proposed Design Changes
John Hartwell Cocke to Thomas Jefferson
Dear Sir, Bremo May 3d. 1819
Conversations with Mr. Brockenbrough and other practical
Mechanicks:
together with estimates made by Mr. B. & myself have induced me
to suggest
some changes in the Hotels & Dormitories designed to be
connected with them,
which are about to be erected at the University. In the
Dormitories upon the
upper level, connecting the Pavilions, I wou'd propose no change.
(832) The beauty &
convenience of this part of the plan more than counterbalances some
objections
which present themselves to my mind. Indeed here, it does not
appear to me,
that any change cou'd be made for the better unless the low pitched
roofs
concealed by a railing (upon the plan I once suggested) shou'd be
found to be
better & more śconomical coverings & to render the rooms
more comfortable by
keeping the Sun at a greater distance from the ceilings.
Perhaps upon examination of the inclosed scheme (if I succeed
in making you
comprehend my imperfect sketch) you may deem it worthy of
consideration, how
far its cheapness, the more retired situation of the Students
apartments, and being
less exposes to the influence of the Sun, may recommend it for
adoption--notwithstanding the sacrifice it demands in Architectural
beauty.(833)
You will perceive by the graduated paper upon which the plan
is laid down
that the area of the building proposed is 56 by 36 feet--and that
the divisions of
the first floor are the same proposed in your plan for Hotel No.
1--with the
exception of the passage between the two small rooms. This is a
necessary
change to embrace all the objects designd to be
comprehend'd I shoud propose
that this building present its gable toward the pavilions and that
the Door
represented thereon be its principal entrance--& into a large
Street running
parallel with the back inclosures of the professors gardens. By
this arrangement
& making the kitchen under the opposite end of the House, the
natural fall in the
land, (intended to be represented by the diagonal line on the
basement story of
the side view) will releave this apartment from the evil of being
under ground and
place the kitchen floor upon a level with the back yard. And woud
not the
gardens as now designed to be divided between the Hotels &
Pavilions be too
small--at any rate for the purposes of the former? To obviate
this, upon the plan
here proposed, we might give extensive gardens to the Hotels
adjoining their
kitchen yards & running back from the street on which they
front. Shou'd this
leave the Professors gardens too long we may curtail them &
move up the Hotels
nearer to the line of Pavilions--as smaller gardens will certainly
do for the
professors than will be required for the Hotels.
This plan gives sixteen rooms for Students besides those
designed for the
keeper of the Hotel & the large public room. The Students
rooms will be about
12 ft. by 14. ft. 6 in. a fire place in each, 8 in the 2d Story 9
ft. pitch & 8 in the
Attic 8 ft pitch. It is presumed that these rooms will be much
more private from
being in upper stories than the Dormitories opening as they do into
the public
walk, & that they will be more cool and comfortable in
Summer--The
comparative cost of the two plans will be seen by calculating the
expence of the
Single building at 239,700 bricks and the Dormitory plan to afford
the same
number of Rooms at 389,100
Your greater facility & accuracy in such calculations will
readily detect any
error in which I may have fallen in making the estimates of the
number of bricks
required, in the respective plans--I therefore add the following
data upon which I
have gone. The ground plan of the Single building as stated above
56 ft. by 36--Cellar story,* if of brick 2˝ thick & 10 ft. high
including foundation & depth of
joist.
First Story 2. bricks thick 12 ft. high including depth of
joists leaving 11 ft.
between floor & ceiling
Second Story including Attic 16 ft. high 1˝ thick
2 gable parapets rising to the ridge of the roof which at
2/9's of the span
will be 8 ft. 1˝--
1 Basemt. partition wall 2˝ thick--First Story Do. 2.
brick Second Story
& Attic Do. 1˝.
4 Chimney breasts & Shafts containing 36,640.
The dimensions of the Hotel No. 1. I have put down from Memory
& also
the dimensions of the Dormitories, it is therefore highly probable
I have misstated
some of them.
the ground plan of Hotel No. 1--50. by 34. Cellar Story 10
ft. high 2˝
bricks thick. First Floor 18 ft. high 2 bricks thick--Basement
partition walls 2
bricks--First Floor Do. 1˝
3 Chimney hearts 16,650 Arcade 15,000--
Dormitories 14 ft. sqr. in the clear
Foundations
Upper Walls
Chimney hearts
44
3
44
11
4.6
14
2 brick
1˝
2
The Dormitory dimensions, adding 168 bricks for
Chimney Shaft, give 13,500 for each. In all these
calculations I have made no allowance for openings
excepted in the Arcade of Hotel No. 1. but the
openings being nearly the same in each plan wou'd
not materially vary the comparative result.
By adopting the Single building we get over the
difficulty of flat roofs. I find
it to be the universal opinion of all the mechanicks to whom I have
mentioned the
subject (and in this opinion Mr. Brockenbrough fully accords) that
the most
durable timber we have will last but a few years in any situation
where it is liable
to be wet & dry alternately.--but especially when the timber is
in huge peices &
is placed in a horizontal position. The best heart pine Shingling
will last about 30
years. But this may be accounts for from the small size of each
peice--the nature
of Shingling admitting the access of air & Sun to a surface
which bears so large a
proportion to the whole mass of each peice--And the angle which it
makes with
the horizontal lan throwing off the water quickly from its
surface--These causes
all combining to dry it rapidly after rain.--As to shingle roofs,
it is a maxim
confirmed by all experience that the higher the pitch the more
lasting the
Covering--This is manifestly the effect of less water being
absorped, from its
going off more rapidly--and seems to show; that as timber
approaches a
horizontal position, where it is exposed to be wit & dry its
liability to decay
increases. I think you informed me your experiment had as yet
stood the test of
but 7 years--Will it not be hazarding too much to adopt it upon so
large a scale
as is proposed in the Dormitories now to be built? And if any
other mode of flat
covering be adopted, the result of a comparative estimate with the
plan here
offer'd, must be still more against it upon the score of śconomy.
I am aware,
that the elevation of the plan now suggested, the appearance of the
Chimneys and
the roof will be offensive to your cultivated taste but perhaps you
may think of
some stile of finishing with parapet walls at the ends &
balustrades between the
Chimneys (as are awkwardly represented in the sketch) that will so
far cover its
deformity as to render it admissible upon the score of śconomy
& comfort.
I am induced to write upon this subject knowing that Mr.
Brockenbrough
will be with you this week and being now very unwell--which makes
it quite
uncertain whether it will be in my power to be up at the Circuit
Court, as I
intended.
I have also to inform you, that the difficulties which seem to
stand in the way
of carrying the design of Genl. Koscioscos will into execution--in
the first place
from the scarcity of Schools about me & 2dly. from the
prejudices to be
encountered in obtaining admission for negroes--to say nothing of
the effect
which might be produced on the minds of my own people--must induce
me to
decline the undertaking. I presume the terms of the Will give you
no discretion
that wou'd admit of your directing the fund to the accomplishment
of the object
in the way set forth in the inclosed paper. I send you the paper,
as I shou'd be
glad to know your opinion as to the practicality of the scheme of
the
Colonization Society--I suppose you are in possession of the late
information
collated by Messrs. Mills & Burgess on the Coast of Africa with
a view to this
object.--I am Sir Yours respectfully
J. H. Cocke
*If this part of the design is executed in Masonry--Walls 2 ft.
6 & less wou'd
hardly do--at $3.50 pr perch which is as low as we shall get it, it
will cost only
6$ less than brick.
ALS, 4p, ViU:TJ [1690], with TJ docket "Cocke John H. Bremo
May 3. 19. recd
May 9." and docket "J. H. Cocke to T.J. 3 May 19."; ADft, dated 2
May, ViU:JHC.
Thomas Jefferson to James Breckenridge,
Robert B. Taylor, James Madison, & Chapman
Johnson
Dear Sir Monticello July 8.[-26] 19.
Proposing within a few days to set out for Bedford, I think it
a duty
previously to state to you the progress and prospect of things at
the University.
You may perhaps remember that almost in the moment of our
separation at the
last meeting one of our colleagues proposed a change of a part of
the plan of the
grounds,(834) so as to place the
gardens of the Professors adjacent to the rear of their
pavilions. the first aspect of the proposition presented to me a
difficulty, which I
then thought insuperable to wit, that of the approach of carriages,
wood-carts
Etc. to the back of the buildings. mr Cabell's desire
however appeared so strong,
and the object of it so proper, that, after separation, I undertook
to examine &
try whether it could not be accomplished; and was happy to find it
practicable, by
a change which was approved by Genl. Cocke, and since by mr Cabell
who has
been lately with me.(835) I think
it a real improvement, and the greater, as by
throwing the Hotels and additional dormitories on a back street, it
forms in fact
the commencement of a regular town, capable of being enlarged to
any extent
which future circumstances may call for.
My colleague of the Committee of superintendance proposed
another change,
to wit, that the Hotels and dormitories should be united in massive
buildings of 2.
or 3. stories high, on the back street. had my judgment concurred
in this
alteration, I should not have thought ourselves competent to it, as
a committee of
superintendance. the separation of the students in different and
unconnected
rooms, by two's and two's, seems a fundamental of the plan. it was
adopted by
the first visitors of the Central college, stated by them in their
original report to
the Governor as their patron, and by him laid before the
legislature; it was
approved and reported by the Commissioners of Rockfish gap to the
legislature;
of their opinion indeed we have no other evidence than their acting
on it without
directing a change. not thinking therefore that the committee was
competent to
this change, I concurred in suspending the building of any Hotel
until the visitors
should have an opportunity of considering the subject, and, instead
of building
one or two Hotels, as they had directed, we concluded to begin the
Eastern range
of pavilions, all agreeing that the ranges on each side of the lawn
should be
finished as begun. we thought too that the Visitors would not
disapprove of this
departure from their instructions, as these pavilions can be used
for Hotels until
wanting for the Professors.
We have adopted another measure however, without their
sanction, because
it is in fact a fuller execution of the principles expressed and
acted on at their
meeting: and we are confident they would have adopted it had it
then occurred.
their idea was to push the buildings to the extent of all the funds
we could
command. altho' we had recieved the opinion of the Treasurer and
literary board
that we might command at any moment the whole donation for this
year, yet it
seems not to have occurred to any of us at the time, that we might
do the same
the next year, and consequently draw it's 15,000. D. on the 1st.
day of January
next. the thought occurring afterwards, we have not hesitated to
act on it; & we
are proceeding to have 3. pavilions erected on the Eastern range,
with their
appurtenant dormitories, in addition to the 4. built, or to be
built on the Western
range; so that we may have 7. pavilions, with their dormitories, in
progress this
year, to be finished the next.
Our principle being to employ the whole of our funds on the
buildings, I
thought it so important to be preparing subjects for the
University, by the time
that should open, that I invited a mr Stack, a teacher of Latin
& Greek of high
recommendations, to come and set up a school in Charlottesville on
his own
account. he has done so, and answers my best expectations, by a
style of
instruction, critical and solid, beyond any example I have ever
known in this
state, or indeed in the US. he recieved his education at Trinity
college, Dublin, &
appears to be a correct, modest and estimable man. he teaches
French also: and
to give an opportunity to the students of acquiring the habit of
speaking that
language, we have got Laporte and his family from the Calfpasture
to establish a
boarding house where, nothing but French being permitted to be
spoken, his
boarders begin already to ask for all their wants in that language,
and to learn the
ordinary phrases of familiar conversation. Mr. Stack has as yet
but 14. or 15.
pupils and Laporte 9. boarders; but as soon as the present sessions
in the schools
of the state generally are ended and the youths liberated from
their present
engagements, we have reason to believe more will be offered than
can be
recieved; and in this way I think we may have from 50. to 100.
subjects fully
prepared to attend the scientific professors the moment the
University opens. I
have recieved from London the offer of a Professor of modern
languages, of
qualifications literary and moral, so high as to merit our
suffrage, if we can get
over the difficulty that, French being the most important of the
modern
languages, mr Blatterman is not a native of France. mr Ticknor
declines coming
to us, I shall again try mr Bowditch, with some additional, but
with not much
final hope. we have the offer of a botanist of distinguished
science, a mr Nuttal,
but whether a native or not is not said. Dr. Cooper, his wife and
family have
certainly, and strongly set their minds towards us. the minerals
of his collection
have been selected, valued and packed to come on at the time
prescribed.(836)
I had begun to despair of our two Italian sculptors, and
enquired therefore of
a mr Cardelli from Washington whether such as could carve an Ionic
or
Corinthian capitel could be had from that place. he informed me
that they could,
at 3. D. a day. luckily the two Italians arrived some days ago
after a sea-passage
of 90. days. they will cost us, passage and board included, about
2. D. a day, and
are men of quite superior character. I was just setting off for
Bedford to stay
there 2. months; but have deferred my departure till mr
Brockenbrough can arrive
here, in order to see them fixed and put under way, that the stone
might be
quarried, and roughed out for them, so that they should be employed
on difficult
work only.(837)
Our works have gone on miserably slow. not a brick is yet
laid. they are
now however prepared to begin laying the Western pavilion No. 1.
our
advertisement for workmen could not be put into the papers until
after the
meeting of the visitors at the close of March. the offers from the
Undertakers of
our own state were from 25. to 40. p.c. on the Philadelphia printed
prices. we at
length got an offer from Philadelphia at 15. p.c. below the printed
prices, & learnt
the fact that when work abounds there the workmen are able to raise
prices 10.
or 15. p.c. above these, and when work is scarce the employers are
able to beat
them down to 10. or 15. below the printed prices; which however, if
continued,
soon breaks them. we did not think it either our duty or interest
to break our
workmen, and considering the printed as the fair living prices, we
agreed to give
them. an undertaker came on to see the extent of the work we had
to do. this
brought our own people down to the same prices; so we assigned to
them the
completion of the Western range, and to the Philadelphians the
Eastern.(838) these,
20 in number arrived at Richmond some days ago and are expected
here this day.
we shall now have about 100. hands at work.(839) I am in hopes the convenience
of
talking over, and settling our business here at our leisure, will
be an inducement
to you to make this your head quarters at our next meeting in
addition to the
gratification it will be to me to have you here, and I salute you
with great
friendship & respect.
Th: Jefferson
P.S. July 11. a vast embarrasment has this moment befallen us.
our two Italians
examined our quarry yesterday and pronounce it impossible to make
of it an
Ionic or Corinthian capitel, and they can work only in these
ornamental parts, &
not at all in plain work. I never was so nonplussed. they have
cost us a great
deal of money, & how to avoid it's becoming a loss, & how
to get our work
done, is the difficulty. I shall consult with mr Brockenbrough on
it to-day, &
depart tomorrow.
Poplar Forest. July 16. I have brought my letter on to this
place, open for
the insertion of a 2d. P.S. I left the Italians making trial
whether our stone would
stand the cutting the leaves of a Corinthian capitel. if it does
not, they will go to
work on the Ionic capitels for which it will answer, and we must
get stone
elsewhere for the Corinthian, of which order we have only 2.
pavilions of 4.
columns each, 4 pavilions Ionic, and 4 Doric. the Philadelphians
had arrived at
the University & had set to work.
ALS, addressed to James Breckenridge, ViU:TJ, 4p [1715]; ALS,
addressed to
James Madison, DLC:JM; polygraph copy, addressed to Breckenridge,
Robert B.
Taylor, and Champman Johnson, DLC:TJ; polygraph copy, addressed to
Madison,
DLC:TJ; printed (extract), O'Neal, "Michele and Giacomo Raggi at
the University of
Virginia," Magazine of Albemarle County History, 18:16-17;
transcript (extract),
#00-15 in Lasala, "Thomas Jefferson's Designs for the University of
Virginia." The
word in angle brackets is mutilated on the ALS addressed to
Breckenridge, but clear
on the polygraph copy addressed to Taylor, Breckenridge, and
Johnson. On that copy
the second postscript was inserted within square brackets by TJ
after the copy was
finished with the notation "P.S. added to Genl. Breckenridge only."
The second
polygraph copy does not contain either postcript. See the notes
below for other major
variations between the texts.
|