Reading the Rainbow
Rachel Muers
University of Cambridge
The striking textual links between the book of Jonah and the Genesis
account of the Flood, noted by the Cambridge
Biblical Reasoning group, call for further reflection on the
relationship between the stories. Jonah is after Noah; but he,
like his reader, is turned back to reread the story of Noah and ask what
it means for those who identify themselves as "children of
Abraham".
The covenant with Noah is a covenant with "all flesh", and
it centres on a change in God's heart (Genesis 8:21). From this point
onwards, God has determined Godself for patience with, and faithfulness
to, everything living – a covenant whose scope is unimaginable,
taking in as it does not only "all generations" of humanity
but the vast numbers of living creatures. The rainbow, the very first
sign God makes, is established to remind God of this covenant
(Genesis 9:15). God declares how it is to be read by other readers
– as a sign for God of God's own faithfulness to "every
living creature of all flesh that is on the earth". God is, in this
story, a reader of signs who draws others into the process of
reading.
In the book of Jonah, I suggest, we see God teaching Jonah to read
the signs of God's faithfulness and steadfast love, as God reads
them. The point is not the continuing need of humanity to be
reminded that God is faithful and "abounding in steadfast
love" - Jonah knows that already (Jonah 4:2) – but rather the
need to learn to read the signs of God's faithfulness. The natural world
in the book of Jonah is full of signs of God's faithfulness to "all
flesh" - the fish that "the LORD appointed", the bush,
the people and animals in Nineveh – which are repeatedly misread by
Jonah.
What explains the tension between Jonah's acknowledgement that the
LORD "made the sea and the dry land" and his seemingly futile
attempt to flee from God by going to sea? Perhaps it can be explored in
terms of the tension between an assertion of God's "global"
concern and the practices of exclusion that such an assertion can often
mask. It is one thing to say "God has made a covenant with all
flesh" and another to say "God has made a covenant with both
me and my enemy". The former requires no new readings, the latter
only comes about when one is taught by God to read the signs. Jonah
learns to read the fish, the bush, and finally Nineveh itself. We might
see this as part of the ongoing encounter between God and all the
children of Abraham through which they, as (also) children of Noah,
learn to "read the rainbow".
The "reading" of the rainbow (and it must be noted here
that the rainbow itself is not a "word" of God, not quite the
same as a text; davar does not appear in Genesis until chapter
11) occurs in connection with the reading of texts that convey and
interpret the divine sign. Noah is silent until after the flood and the
declaration of God's covenant.[i] After
Noah, people enter conversation with one another and with God. The very
fact that Jonah can call on God (for the first time in this story,
although the sailors have addressed God already!) from the belly of the
fish serves as a reminder that his life is located in the aftermath of
the covenant with Noah, in the time in which the natural and human
worlds are full of signs.
Jonah, then, knows that God is "slow to anger and abiding in
steadfast love" because he is of the people within which that
particular naming of God by Godself is recorded and reflected on –
because he is, as he says, a Hebrew (1:9). Being a child of Abraham as
well as a child of Noah means, perhaps, not only being taught to
read the rainbow, each time in each particular situation, but being
taught how to read the rainbow. The readers of these texts are
made into "readers of the rainbow" by being given a further
set of signs – signs that bring them into practices and ways of
relating appropriate to readers of the sign of God's faithfulness.
Also remembered in the book of Jonah, however, is the threat of
destruction – without which the contexts in which the divine promise
of faithfulness is relearnt make no sense. The waters that Jonah enters
do not destroy him; and his liturgy from the depths points back to a
puzzle in the story of Noah. God's words in Genesis 8:21 suggest that
God has destroyed "all flesh", this once and never
again; so what is the status of Noah and those with him, with whom the
covenant is made? (There is an interesting comparison with Jonah's
declaration that he speaks from "the land whose bars closed upon me
for ever", 2:6 – how would it really be possible to speak from
this place?). A deep question seems to remain about the nature of the
resolve God makes – compounded by the close association between that
resolve and God's recognition of the "evil intention" of the
human heart. The rainbow is obviously an "open sign", perhaps
the open sign that opens all the divine signs; less obviously, it seems
at the same time to be a sign of something hidden.
As the Christian scriptures reread the story of Noah, these tensions
in interpretation, far from being resolved, become even more apparent
– together with words concerning the "one greater than
Jonah", who is also greater than Noah. 1 Peter 3:18ff. speaks of
God's patience before the flood, "during the building of the
ark", hence for the sake of the salvation of the few. On one
reading of this passage, what is spoken of here in connection with
Christ is a repetition of that patience, which consigns those
outside (that is, outside the group reading this letter and owning these
words) to the deluge. That is the repetition of divine patience that
Jonah seems to seek, or assume God seeks. For Jonah, God will wait until
the right time to destroy those excluded from God's future – that
must be either Jonah or the Ninevites.
However, Jonah's story takes a different turn, and 1 Peter 3:18ff.
takes a very different turn. Christ's preaching is to "the
spirits in prison, who were disobedient during the days of
Noah". Part of the point about Noah's story, it seems, is that
it cannot be repeated; God has sworn never again to destroy all flesh.
Its "non-repetition" in the book of Jonah is directed at the
relearning, within the order established by the covenant with Noah, of
the scope of God's faithfulness. Its non-repetition in 1 Peter seems to
be about a further reinterpretation even of the "change in God's
heart" – somehow to include the "spirits in
prison".
A discussion of this latter point would lie outside the scope of this
article; but this whole consideration of Jonah raises an important
question for the exercise of scriptural reasoning itself. If Jonah, this
figure of the "Abrahamic" scriptures, only makes sense in the
context of the covenant with Noah, what is the relationship between
Abraham and Noah? What would it mean for the children of Abraham to
understand themselves as also children of Noah?
[i] See on this Andre Neher,
L’exil de la parole. It is noteworthy, however, that the
Qu’ranic account of Noah focuses on his preaching before the
deluge (Surah 71), and that rabbinic commentaries describe him praying
in the ark.
Title Page | Archive
© 2003, Society for Scriptural Reasoning
|